<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1947 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313234</link>
    <description>Employees who opted for the Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2004 were entitled to pension under the General Insurance (Employees) Pension Scheme, 1995 where the requisite qualifying service under paragraph 14 was completed. The Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme expressly granted pension as a benefit and excluded only the additional notional five years of service, so the pension scheme had to be read contextually with the special scheme. The expression &quot;retirement&quot; in the pension scheme was not confined mechanically to superannuation alone and was construed to include retirement under the special voluntary retirement scheme. As a beneficial pension provision, it was given a liberal interpretation in favour of pension eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 18:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1947 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313234</link>
      <description>Employees who opted for the Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2004 were entitled to pension under the General Insurance (Employees) Pension Scheme, 1995 where the requisite qualifying service under paragraph 14 was completed. The Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme expressly granted pension as a benefit and excluded only the additional notional five years of service, so the pension scheme had to be read contextually with the special scheme. The expression &quot;retirement&quot; in the pension scheme was not confined mechanically to superannuation alone and was construed to include retirement under the special voluntary retirement scheme. As a beneficial pension provision, it was given a liberal interpretation in favour of pension eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>