<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1448 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313233</link>
    <description>The SC of India dismissed the appeal, upholding the impugned judgment. The bench, comprising Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari, found no grounds for interference. The appellant was represented by Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, while the respondent&#039;s counsel included Mr. Sanjay Hegde.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 18:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1448 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313233</link>
      <description>The SC of India dismissed the appeal, upholding the impugned judgment. The bench, comprising Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari, found no grounds for interference. The appellant was represented by Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, while the respondent&#039;s counsel included Mr. Sanjay Hegde.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>