<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 10 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36327</link>
    <description>A Hindu undivided family business does not become a valid partnership for income-tax purposes merely because family members execute partnership deeds. Where the business capital and assets remain undivided coparcenary property and no partition of the joint family assets is shown, the concern continues in substance as a joint family business. In that situation, coparceners cannot simultaneously retain their joint family character and treat the same undivided property as partnership property. The article states that, on these facts, no valid partnership came into existence and registration of the firm was rightly refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 10 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36327</link>
      <description>A Hindu undivided family business does not become a valid partnership for income-tax purposes merely because family members execute partnership deeds. Where the business capital and assets remain undivided coparcenary property and no partition of the joint family assets is shown, the concern continues in substance as a joint family business. In that situation, coparceners cannot simultaneously retain their joint family character and treat the same undivided property as partnership property. The article states that, on these facts, no valid partnership came into existence and registration of the firm was rightly refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>