<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1246 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, focusing on statistical purposes. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reject the AO&#039;s enhancement of sales turnover and higher GP rate due to lack of evidence. Disallowances under sections 40A(3) and 43B were upheld, while the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was remanded for fresh adjudication. The addition of capital expenditure was confirmed as unchallenged by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 17:12:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1246 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, focusing on statistical purposes. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reject the AO&#039;s enhancement of sales turnover and higher GP rate due to lack of evidence. Disallowances under sections 40A(3) and 43B were upheld, while the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was remanded for fresh adjudication. The addition of capital expenditure was confirmed as unchallenged by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>