<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 1002 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313221</link>
    <description>A complaint under section 142(a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed through a power of attorney holder can support cognizance only if the authorisation is produced before the Magistrate. Where that authorisation is not placed on record, the summoning order is unsustainable. The complaint may also be quashed where the allegations are inherently improbable on their own showing, and where suppression of the wider dispute shows the proceedings are a counterblast and an abuse of process under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. On these grounds, the summoning order and consequential proceedings were set aside and the complaints were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 15:52:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 1002 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313221</link>
      <description>A complaint under section 142(a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed through a power of attorney holder can support cognizance only if the authorisation is produced before the Magistrate. Where that authorisation is not placed on record, the summoning order is unsustainable. The complaint may also be quashed where the allegations are inherently improbable on their own showing, and where suppression of the wider dispute shows the proceedings are a counterblast and an abuse of process under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. On these grounds, the summoning order and consequential proceedings were set aside and the complaints were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>