<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1038 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313216</link>
    <description>The SC affirmed the supremacy of its decisions over circulars issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. It clarified that while circulars are binding on revenue authorities, they cannot override judicial pronouncements. The Court dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeals and allowed those by the revenue, reinforcing that judicial interpretations prevail over executive circulars, thus upholding the rule of law and ensuring the right to challenge legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 11:48:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1038 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313216</link>
      <description>The SC affirmed the supremacy of its decisions over circulars issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. It clarified that while circulars are binding on revenue authorities, they cannot override judicial pronouncements. The Court dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeals and allowed those by the revenue, reinforcing that judicial interpretations prevail over executive circulars, thus upholding the rule of law and ensuring the right to challenge legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>