<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 75 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36323</link>
    <description>The expenses incurred before the commencement of business were considered part of the actual cost of fixed assets, allowing depreciation and development rebate. The income from leasing the plant, machinery, and building was to be computed under &quot;Profits and gains of business,&quot; recognizing the temporary lease as a continuation of business activities. Both issues were resolved in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:43:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 75 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36323</link>
      <description>The expenses incurred before the commencement of business were considered part of the actual cost of fixed assets, allowing depreciation and development rebate. The income from leasing the plant, machinery, and building was to be computed under &quot;Profits and gains of business,&quot; recognizing the temporary lease as a continuation of business activities. Both issues were resolved in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>