https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750815 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is ordinarily not exercised against a GST assessment order where an effective statutory appeal is available, particularly under the Jharkhand GST Act. The Court noted that objections based on alleged natural justice violations and premature passing of the order involved factual disputes about service and the time allowed for reply, which were better examined by the appellate authority. Challenges to show-cause notices are also generally not entertained. The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal remedy. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750815 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is ordinarily not exercised against a GST assessment order where an effective statutory appeal is available, particularly under the Jharkhand GST Act. The Court noted that objections based on alleged natural justice violations and premature passing of the order involved factual disputes about service and the time allowed for reply, which were better examined by the appellate authority. Challenges to show-cause notices are also generally not entertained. The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal remedy. Case-Laws GST Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750815