<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1311 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750814</link>
    <description>Corporate guarantees under GST were challenged on the basis that the circular and amended valuation treatment warranted immediate judicial interference. The High Court issued notice, directed filing of counter affidavit and rejoinder, and granted interim protection by ordering that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner if a final assessment order is passed or a demand is created.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1311 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750814</link>
      <description>Corporate guarantees under GST were challenged on the basis that the circular and amended valuation treatment warranted immediate judicial interference. The High Court issued notice, directed filing of counter affidavit and rejoinder, and granted interim protection by ordering that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner if a final assessment order is passed or a demand is created.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>