<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1296 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750799</link>
    <description>Cum-duty value could not be adopted to compute customs duty on the FOB value of iron ore fines for export duty purposes. The Tribunal treated the issue as no longer res integra and followed its earlier decisions holding that export duty on iron ore fines must not be worked out on a cum-duty basis. Applying that settled view, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals and sustained the impugned orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:23:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1296 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750799</link>
      <description>Cum-duty value could not be adopted to compute customs duty on the FOB value of iron ore fines for export duty purposes. The Tribunal treated the issue as no longer res integra and followed its earlier decisions holding that export duty on iron ore fines must not be worked out on a cum-duty basis. Applying that settled view, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals and sustained the impugned orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>