https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750793 Dismissal of a Section 7 application solely for alleged non-compliance with service directions was not justified where notice had been issued, paper publication was directed, and counsel for the corporate debtor appeared before the adjudicating authority seeking time to file vakalatnama and a counter affidavit. That appearance showed awareness of the proceedings. On these facts, the dismissal was held erroneous and was set aside, and the application was revived for fresh consideration in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2024 17:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750793 Dismissal of a Section 7 application solely for alleged non-compliance with service directions was not justified where notice had been issued, paper publication was directed, and counsel for the corporate debtor appeared before the adjudicating authority seeking time to file vakalatnama and a counter affidavit. That appearance showed awareness of the proceedings. On these facts, the dismissal was held erroneous and was set aside, and the application was revived for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750793