<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal Rules on CENVAT Credit Refund and Service Tax Issues, Remands for Further Verification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76199</link>
    <description>Refund of CENVAT Credit - services related to Information Technology (ITSS) - The appellate tribunal analyzed submissions regarding the eligibility for refund on ITSS, the denial of CENVAT credit, denial of credit for service tax paid on generators, and discrepancies between CENVAT records and ST-3 returns. The Tribunal found that while the appellant demonstrated independence from M/s Agilent Technologies (Singapore), they failed to provide evidence of valid orders for ITSS services, leading to the denial of the refund claim. However, they ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the denial of CENVAT credit, credit for service tax paid on generators, and discrepancies between records, remanding these matters for further verification and consideration by the Original Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:22:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:22:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal Rules on CENVAT Credit Refund and Service Tax Issues, Remands for Further Verification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76199</link>
      <description>Refund of CENVAT Credit - services related to Information Technology (ITSS) - The appellate tribunal analyzed submissions regarding the eligibility for refund on ITSS, the denial of CENVAT credit, denial of credit for service tax paid on generators, and discrepancies between CENVAT records and ST-3 returns. The Tribunal found that while the appellant demonstrated independence from M/s Agilent Technologies (Singapore), they failed to provide evidence of valid orders for ITSS services, leading to the denial of the refund claim. However, they ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the denial of CENVAT credit, credit for service tax paid on generators, and discrepancies between records, remanding these matters for further verification and consideration by the Original Authority.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:22:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>