<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36316</link>
    <description>A provision for taxation is not a reserve, surplus or fund for inclusion in capital under rule 1 of the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, because the Explanation does not expand those terms to cover such a provision. The court followed its earlier view and rejected the assessee&#039;s claim on capital computation. However, the same provision may qualify as a fund deductible from the cost of investments under clause (ii) of rule 2 of the Second Schedule. A question of law raised before the Tribunal can still be examined in reference even if not expressly dealt with in its order, and the assessee succeeded on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:22:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36316</link>
      <description>A provision for taxation is not a reserve, surplus or fund for inclusion in capital under rule 1 of the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, because the Explanation does not expand those terms to cover such a provision. The court followed its earlier view and rejected the assessee&#039;s claim on capital computation. However, the same provision may qualify as a fund deductible from the cost of investments under clause (ii) of rule 2 of the Second Schedule. A question of law raised before the Tribunal can still be examined in reference even if not expressly dealt with in its order, and the assessee succeeded on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>