<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 36 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36314</link>
    <description>Feeding mulberry leaves to silkworms is not a process ordinarily employed by a cultivator to render mulberry leaves marketable within section 2(1)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The statutory test requires the process to be customary, directed to making the agricultural produce marketable, and to leave the original produce identifiable in substance after processing. Here, the leaves were consumed by the silkworms and ceased to exist as mulberry leaves, while the cocoons did not retain any identifiable character as that produce. Income from selling the cocoons therefore does not qualify as agricultural income under the provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:20:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 36 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36314</link>
      <description>Feeding mulberry leaves to silkworms is not a process ordinarily employed by a cultivator to render mulberry leaves marketable within section 2(1)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The statutory test requires the process to be customary, directed to making the agricultural produce marketable, and to leave the original produce identifiable in substance after processing. Here, the leaves were consumed by the silkworms and ceased to exist as mulberry leaves, while the cocoons did not retain any identifiable character as that produce. Income from selling the cocoons therefore does not qualify as agricultural income under the provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>