<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1231 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313200</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s judgment finding the appellants guilty of contempt for violating its order dated 5th February 2010. The SC concluded that the delay in compliance was not willful but due to the necessity of collecting quantifiable data. It directed the State to act on the Bhatnagar Committee&#039;s report per M. Nagaraj and Suraj Bhan Meena within two months, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 17:28:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1231 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313200</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s judgment finding the appellants guilty of contempt for violating its order dated 5th February 2010. The SC concluded that the delay in compliance was not willful but due to the necessity of collecting quantifiable data. It directed the State to act on the Bhatnagar Committee&#039;s report per M. Nagaraj and Suraj Bhan Meena within two months, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>