<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2024 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313198</link>
    <description>The appeal concerning the disallowance of additional depreciation was partly allowed. The ITAT upheld the assessee&#039;s eligibility to claim the balance 50% depreciation for plant and machinery used for less than 180 days in the previous year, as per Section 32(1)(iia). The AO was directed to allow the claim, resolving the issue in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 16:05:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2024 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313198</link>
      <description>The appeal concerning the disallowance of additional depreciation was partly allowed. The ITAT upheld the assessee&#039;s eligibility to claim the balance 50% depreciation for plant and machinery used for less than 180 days in the previous year, as per Section 32(1)(iia). The AO was directed to allow the claim, resolving the issue in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>