https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313197 An auction sale tainted by inadequate publicity, absence of genuine competition, gross inadequacy of price, and collusion between the judgment-debtor and the auction-purchaser may be treated as fraud on the court and the decree-holder. In such circumstances, limitation does not protect a transaction procured by fraud, and the court may use its inherent jurisdiction to prevent abuse of process and set aside the sale on its own motion. A person lacking direct interest may not have a maintainable challenge under Section 47 or Order 21 Rule 90, but information supplied by that person can still enable the court to act suo motu and order a fresh sale after proper proclamation. en-us Mon, 17 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2024 16:05:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313197 An auction sale tainted by inadequate publicity, absence of genuine competition, gross inadequacy of price, and collusion between the judgment-debtor and the auction-purchaser may be treated as fraud on the court and the decree-holder. In such circumstances, limitation does not protect a transaction procured by fraud, and the court may use its inherent jurisdiction to prevent abuse of process and set aside the sale on its own motion. A person lacking direct interest may not have a maintainable challenge under Section 47 or Order 21 Rule 90, but information supplied by that person can still enable the court to act suo motu and order a fresh sale after proper proclamation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313197