https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313195 The HC allowed the appeal in part, overturning the trial court's decision on partition of the suit properties. It found the first respondent's claim for partition misconceived due to insufficient evidence of financial contribution. The appellant's request to withdraw the suit was denied, and the associated miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:47:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313195 The HC allowed the appeal in part, overturning the trial court's decision on partition of the suit properties. It found the first respondent's claim for partition misconceived due to insufficient evidence of financial contribution. The appellant's request to withdraw the suit was denied, and the associated miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313195