<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1274 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750777</link>
    <description>HC addressed garnishee orders challenging tax assessment, directing petitioner to deposit remaining Rs. 1,72,989 within two days to lift bank account restrictions. Court mandated statutory appeals filing within three months of Tribunal President&#039;s appointment, subject to pre-deposit compliance. Garnishee orders would be suspended upon meeting prescribed conditions, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1274 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750777</link>
      <description>HC addressed garnishee orders challenging tax assessment, directing petitioner to deposit remaining Rs. 1,72,989 within two days to lift bank account restrictions. Court mandated statutory appeals filing within three months of Tribunal President&#039;s appointment, subject to pre-deposit compliance. Garnishee orders would be suspended upon meeting prescribed conditions, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>