<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Overrules Tax Liability for Reporting Error, Cites Legal Compliance Despite Delay in Rectification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76193</link>
    <description>Short payment of GST on unreconciled sales turnover - non-reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The assessing officer rejected the petitioner&#039;s explanation, citing lethargy in maintaining accounts. However, the High Court found that even if the petitioner was lax in rectifying the mistake promptly, it didn&#039;t justify the substantial tax liability imposed solely based on a reporting error. The Court noted that the statute didn&#039;t allow rectification until the annual return was filed, and therefore, the petitioner&#039;s actions were within legal bounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:48:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:48:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Overrules Tax Liability for Reporting Error, Cites Legal Compliance Despite Delay in Rectification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76193</link>
      <description>Short payment of GST on unreconciled sales turnover - non-reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The assessing officer rejected the petitioner&#039;s explanation, citing lethargy in maintaining accounts. However, the High Court found that even if the petitioner was lax in rectifying the mistake promptly, it didn&#039;t justify the substantial tax liability imposed solely based on a reporting error. The Court noted that the statute didn&#039;t allow rectification until the annual return was filed, and therefore, the petitioner&#039;s actions were within legal bounds.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:48:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>