<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1271 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750774</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether letting out hostel rooms to unregistered girl students and working women constitutes &quot;renting of residential dwelling for use as residence&quot; exempt under Entry 12 (and allied entries) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The HC held that end-use by the occupants governs exemption, not the nature of the premises or the service-provider&#039;s business; hostel rooms used for sleeping, eating and other residential activities qualify as &quot;residential dwelling&quot; even with common facilities, applying purposive interpretation of exemption notifications. Consequently, the accommodation service was held exempt and the adverse advance ruling orders were set aside, allowing the petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1271 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750774</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether letting out hostel rooms to unregistered girl students and working women constitutes &quot;renting of residential dwelling for use as residence&quot; exempt under Entry 12 (and allied entries) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The HC held that end-use by the occupants governs exemption, not the nature of the premises or the service-provider&#039;s business; hostel rooms used for sleeping, eating and other residential activities qualify as &quot;residential dwelling&quot; even with common facilities, applying purposive interpretation of exemption notifications. Consequently, the accommodation service was held exempt and the adverse advance ruling orders were set aside, allowing the petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>