<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1255 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750758</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune ruled in favor of the assessee regarding deduction under section 80IA(4) for wind mills and solar power plants. The tribunal held that each wind mill and solar power plant constitutes a separate undertaking for deduction purposes, rejecting the AO&#039;s position that all should be treated as one undertaking. Additionally, the tribunal determined that profit from eligible business for section 80IA deduction need not be computed after deducting notional brought forward losses and depreciation, even when previously set off against non-eligible business income. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1255 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750758</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune ruled in favor of the assessee regarding deduction under section 80IA(4) for wind mills and solar power plants. The tribunal held that each wind mill and solar power plant constitutes a separate undertaking for deduction purposes, rejecting the AO&#039;s position that all should be treated as one undertaking. Additionally, the tribunal determined that profit from eligible business for section 80IA deduction need not be computed after deducting notional brought forward losses and depreciation, even when previously set off against non-eligible business income. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>