<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (8) TMI 2 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36306</link>
    <description>Section 37 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act was confined to rectifying mistakes in assessment orders already passed and could not be used to make a fresh assessment where no assessment order existed. Because no assessment had been made on the joint family income up to the date of partition, the proposed action could not be treated as a valid rectification proceeding. The notice issued under section 37 was therefore invalid and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (8) TMI 2 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36306</link>
      <description>Section 37 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act was confined to rectifying mistakes in assessment orders already passed and could not be used to make a fresh assessment where no assessment order existed. Because no assessment had been made on the joint family income up to the date of partition, the proposed action could not be treated as a valid rectification proceeding. The notice issued under section 37 was therefore invalid and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>