<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Orders Restoration of Company&#039;s Name Despite Filing Gaps, Citing Genuine Compliance Efforts and Substantial Assets.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76160</link>
    <description>Seeking restoration of name of the company on ROC - failure to file the Financial Statement and Annual Returns since incorporation - Section 252 of Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the appellant had filed financial statements until 2015-16, there was a gap in filings for the subsequent years. However, the appellant had produced independent auditor reports for the missing years, demonstrating substantial assets and indicating a bonafide intention to comply. - Considering the appellant&#039;s substantial assets, the Tribunal found it just and equitable to restore the company&#039;s name to the Register of Companies. They emphasized that the appellant was not a shell company or engaged in fund siphoning, and the restoration would not prejudice the Registrar of Companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:46:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:46:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Orders Restoration of Company&#039;s Name Despite Filing Gaps, Citing Genuine Compliance Efforts and Substantial Assets.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76160</link>
      <description>Seeking restoration of name of the company on ROC - failure to file the Financial Statement and Annual Returns since incorporation - Section 252 of Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the appellant had filed financial statements until 2015-16, there was a gap in filings for the subsequent years. However, the appellant had produced independent auditor reports for the missing years, demonstrating substantial assets and indicating a bonafide intention to comply. - Considering the appellant&#039;s substantial assets, the Tribunal found it just and equitable to restore the company&#039;s name to the Register of Companies. They emphasized that the appellant was not a shell company or engaged in fund siphoning, and the restoration would not prejudice the Registrar of Companies.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:46:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>