<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1228 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750731</link>
    <description>The MP HC dismissed a writ petition challenging show cause notices issued for alleged GST and cess evasion in cigarette manufacturing. The court held that judicial review under Article 226 examines procedural compliance, not the decision&#039;s merits. Disputed facts regarding clandestine manufacturing and tax evasion must be adjudicated before competent authorities or appellate forums. The HC cannot entertain writ petitions against show cause notices or determine complex economic offenses involving fraudulent cigarette production without tax payment. The interim order was vacated, with petitioner directed to pursue statutory remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:45:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1228 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750731</link>
      <description>The MP HC dismissed a writ petition challenging show cause notices issued for alleged GST and cess evasion in cigarette manufacturing. The court held that judicial review under Article 226 examines procedural compliance, not the decision&#039;s merits. Disputed facts regarding clandestine manufacturing and tax evasion must be adjudicated before competent authorities or appellate forums. The HC cannot entertain writ petitions against show cause notices or determine complex economic offenses involving fraudulent cigarette production without tax payment. The interim order was vacated, with petitioner directed to pursue statutory remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>