https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313175 In criminal revision against concurrent acquittal for cruelty and dowry harassment, interference is justified only if the findings are perverse, legally unsustainable, or based on an unreasonable appreciation of evidence. The revisional court does not sit as a second appellate court and cannot reappreciate evidence merely because another view is possible. Here, the trial court and appellate court found the dowry-demand and cruelty allegations vague, unsupported by reliable evidence, and marked by material discrepancies in the complainant's version. As the acquittal rested on a reasonably possible view of the record, no patent infirmity or perversity was shown, and the revision was rejected. en-us Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:36:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313175 In criminal revision against concurrent acquittal for cruelty and dowry harassment, interference is justified only if the findings are perverse, legally unsustainable, or based on an unreasonable appreciation of evidence. The revisional court does not sit as a second appellate court and cannot reappreciate evidence merely because another view is possible. Here, the trial court and appellate court found the dowry-demand and cruelty allegations vague, unsupported by reliable evidence, and marked by material discrepancies in the complainant's version. As the acquittal rested on a reasonably possible view of the record, no patent infirmity or perversity was shown, and the revision was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313175