https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313170 A complaint alleging misbranding under the Insecticides Act was held to be time-barred because limitation began when the first report of the competent insecticide testing laboratory was received and disclosed the alleged offence. A later request for re-analysis and the subsequent central laboratory report did not shift or extend the starting point for limitation. As the complaint was filed beyond three years from the first report, cognizance was outside the statutory period. en-us Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:30:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313170 A complaint alleging misbranding under the Insecticides Act was held to be time-barred because limitation began when the first report of the competent insecticide testing laboratory was received and disclosed the alleged offence. A later request for re-analysis and the subsequent central laboratory report did not shift or extend the starting point for limitation. As the complaint was filed beyond three years from the first report, cognizance was outside the statutory period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313170