https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313162 Comparative hardship under the Bombay Rent Act requires consideration of the hardship of both landlord and tenant, judged on reasonable accommodation and all relevant circumstances. An appellate court cannot reverse a trial court's hardship finding by applying an incorrect standard or by ignoring material evidence. The trustees' requirement of premises for charitable structures was also treated as a genuine need for trust purposes, not barred merely because the intended use included facilities such as a marriage hall, clinic, hospital, or nursing home. On that basis, the hardship finding was restored and the objection based on non-residential use failed. en-us Tue, 14 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:18:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313162 Comparative hardship under the Bombay Rent Act requires consideration of the hardship of both landlord and tenant, judged on reasonable accommodation and all relevant circumstances. An appellate court cannot reverse a trial court's hardship finding by applying an incorrect standard or by ignoring material evidence. The trustees' requirement of premises for charitable structures was also treated as a genuine need for trust purposes, not barred merely because the intended use included facilities such as a marriage hall, clinic, hospital, or nursing home. On that basis, the hardship finding was restored and the objection based on non-residential use failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313162