<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1903 (5) TMI 3 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313158</link>
    <description>Section 30 of the Contract Act does not bar a principal&#039;s claim against an agent for money received on the principal&#039;s behalf under void or illegal wagering contracts, where the other contracting party has waived the illegality and paid the money to the agent. The agent cannot refuse to account on the basis of the underlying illegality once receipt on behalf of the principal is established. The text also notes that a fresh finding was required on the amount actually received by the defendants and the balance, if any, payable after deductions for brokerage, commission, and other contractual charges, with a limited remand directed for that inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1903 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1903 (5) TMI 3 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313158</link>
      <description>Section 30 of the Contract Act does not bar a principal&#039;s claim against an agent for money received on the principal&#039;s behalf under void or illegal wagering contracts, where the other contracting party has waived the illegality and paid the money to the agent. The agent cannot refuse to account on the basis of the underlying illegality once receipt on behalf of the principal is established. The text also notes that a fresh finding was required on the amount actually received by the defendants and the balance, if any, payable after deductions for brokerage, commission, and other contractual charges, with a limited remand directed for that inquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1903 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>