https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313156 Execution was held maintainable where a compromise decree had long regulated the parties' turns in seva puja and receipt of offerings, because the claimed entitlement flowed necessarily from the declaration and was not a mere ineffectual declaration. The objection that the execution application was time-barred was rejected, as limitation was treated as running from the later obstruction to performance rather than from the date of the decree, given that the decree had been acted upon for years before resistance arose. The revision was dismissed and the executing court's view was upheld. en-us Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:16:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313156 Execution was held maintainable where a compromise decree had long regulated the parties' turns in seva puja and receipt of offerings, because the claimed entitlement flowed necessarily from the declaration and was not a mere ineffectual declaration. The objection that the execution application was time-barred was rejected, as limitation was treated as running from the later obstruction to performance rather than from the date of the decree, given that the decree had been acted upon for years before resistance arose. The revision was dismissed and the executing court's view was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313156