<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 68 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36293</link>
    <description>Under section 159 of the Income-tax Act, assessment proceedings continued in the name of a deceased assessee are not automatically void. Where the legal representative receives notice, participates without objection, and contests the matter on merits, the defect may be treated as a curable irregularity rather than a jurisdictional nullity. Because the statutory protection is intended for the legal representative&#039;s benefit, it may be waived by conduct. Whether waiver occurred depends on the facts found, including actual participation and absence of timely objection; without those findings, the consequence for limitation on any fresh assessment cannot be finally determined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 16:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 68 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36293</link>
      <description>Under section 159 of the Income-tax Act, assessment proceedings continued in the name of a deceased assessee are not automatically void. Where the legal representative receives notice, participates without objection, and contests the matter on merits, the defect may be treated as a curable irregularity rather than a jurisdictional nullity. Because the statutory protection is intended for the legal representative&#039;s benefit, it may be waived by conduct. Whether waiver occurred depends on the facts found, including actual participation and absence of timely objection; without those findings, the consequence for limitation on any fresh assessment cannot be finally determined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>