<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1207 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750710</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT concluded that the variance in deductions due to changes in business profit did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, thus invalidating the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:53:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1207 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750710</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT concluded that the variance in deductions due to changes in business profit did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, thus invalidating the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>