<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1198 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750701</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that in cases of alleged bogus purchases where accommodation bills are obtained, only the profit element can be assessed, not the entire purchase value. The tribunal determined that for diamond trading transactions, the gross profit rate should be 3%. Since the assessee had already declared 1.42% gross profit, the addition was restricted to 1.58% (3% minus 1.42%) of the alleged bogus purchase value. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order to limit the assessment to this profit differential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:53:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1198 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750701</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that in cases of alleged bogus purchases where accommodation bills are obtained, only the profit element can be assessed, not the entire purchase value. The tribunal determined that for diamond trading transactions, the gross profit rate should be 3%. Since the assessee had already declared 1.42% gross profit, the addition was restricted to 1.58% (3% minus 1.42%) of the alleged bogus purchase value. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order to limit the assessment to this profit differential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>