<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Payments to Non-Resident Telecom Operators for Bandwidth Services Not Taxable as Royalty/FTS, High Court Rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76121</link>
    <description>TDS u/s 195 - payments made to its Non-Resident Telecom Operators (NTOs) for provision of bandwidth capacity and provision of interconnect services - The Tribunal referred to previous proceedings involving the payer (the domestic entity making the payments), where it was initially held that the payments constituted Royalty/FTS and were taxable under section 9 of the Act. However, this decision was later overturned by the jurisdictional High Court, which ruled that the payments were not Royalty/FTS. Relying on the High Court&#039;s judgment, the Tribunal concluded that the payments could not be taxed in the hands of the assessee under section 9 of the Act or the relevant DTAA. Therefore, the CIT(A)’s decision to allow the appeal of the assessee was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:52:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:52:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Payments to Non-Resident Telecom Operators for Bandwidth Services Not Taxable as Royalty/FTS, High Court Rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76121</link>
      <description>TDS u/s 195 - payments made to its Non-Resident Telecom Operators (NTOs) for provision of bandwidth capacity and provision of interconnect services - The Tribunal referred to previous proceedings involving the payer (the domestic entity making the payments), where it was initially held that the payments constituted Royalty/FTS and were taxable under section 9 of the Act. However, this decision was later overturned by the jurisdictional High Court, which ruled that the payments were not Royalty/FTS. Relying on the High Court&#039;s judgment, the Tribunal concluded that the payments could not be taxed in the hands of the assessee under section 9 of the Act or the relevant DTAA. Therefore, the CIT(A)’s decision to allow the appeal of the assessee was upheld.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:52:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>