<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 43 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the forfeited security deposit, disallowed expenditure on an eye-camp, and pension payments to the widow of an ex-employee were not deductible for the respective assessment years. The court upheld these decisions, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the assessee for all four issues. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:12:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 43 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the forfeited security deposit, disallowed expenditure on an eye-camp, and pension payments to the widow of an ex-employee were not deductible for the respective assessment years. The court upheld these decisions, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the assessee for all four issues. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>