<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1184 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750687</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had submitted all necessary documents for finalizing the provisional assessment of the imported goods. It determined that the initial penalty of Rs.20,000 was adequate and found that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked sufficient justification for enhancing the penalty to Rs.1,00,000. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the enhanced penalty and upheld the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:52:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1184 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750687</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had submitted all necessary documents for finalizing the provisional assessment of the imported goods. It determined that the initial penalty of Rs.20,000 was adequate and found that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked sufficient justification for enhancing the penalty to Rs.1,00,000. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the enhanced penalty and upheld the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>