<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1179 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750682</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order-in-appeal, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and providing relief to the respondent. It concluded that no service tax could be charged on corporate guarantees provided without actual consideration. The Tribunal determined that service tax is applicable only on received consideration for taxable services, and since no consideration was received, the Revenue&#039;s argument was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1179 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750682</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order-in-appeal, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and providing relief to the respondent. It concluded that no service tax could be charged on corporate guarantees provided without actual consideration. The Tribunal determined that service tax is applicable only on received consideration for taxable services, and since no consideration was received, the Revenue&#039;s argument was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>