<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750681</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that appellant&#039;s services to overseas universities for student recruitment constituted export of service, not intermediary service. The appellant received consideration in convertible foreign exchange from foreign universities located outside India&#039;s taxable territory. Since appellant provided services on its own account to overseas recipients and received consideration from them, it could not be classified as intermediary service. The department&#039;s contention that appellant rendered dual services to both students and universities was rejected, as no consideration was charged from students and fees were directly remitted to universities. Appeal allowed, service tax liability set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750681</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that appellant&#039;s services to overseas universities for student recruitment constituted export of service, not intermediary service. The appellant received consideration in convertible foreign exchange from foreign universities located outside India&#039;s taxable territory. Since appellant provided services on its own account to overseas recipients and received consideration from them, it could not be classified as intermediary service. The department&#039;s contention that appellant rendered dual services to both students and universities was rejected, as no consideration was charged from students and fees were directly remitted to universities. Appeal allowed, service tax liability set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>