<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1176 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750679</link>
    <description>Liquidated damages received under the contractual arrangement were held not to attract service tax, as the issue had already been settled by prior Tribunal decisions and accepted administratively by the Board. The levy was therefore treated as no longer sustainable, and the service tax demand on such receipts was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:51:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1176 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750679</link>
      <description>Liquidated damages received under the contractual arrangement were held not to attract service tax, as the issue had already been settled by prior Tribunal decisions and accepted administratively by the Board. The levy was therefore treated as no longer sustainable, and the service tax demand on such receipts was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>