<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1167 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750670</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging CGST Authority order, finding alternative statutory remedy exists. Petitioners failed to demonstrate jurisdictional defect or procedural impropriety. Court declined constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 226, emphasizing statutory appeal mechanisms as appropriate recourse for challenging administrative order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1167 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750670</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging CGST Authority order, finding alternative statutory remedy exists. Petitioners failed to demonstrate jurisdictional defect or procedural impropriety. Court declined constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 226, emphasizing statutory appeal mechanisms as appropriate recourse for challenging administrative order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>