<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 2051 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. The CIT(A) had sustained an addition of 17.5% on bogus purchases, which the Tribunal reduced to 5%, citing potential savings from gray market purchases. The reopening of assessment under Sec. 147 was upheld, as new information justified it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 18:11:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 2051 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. The CIT(A) had sustained an addition of 17.5% on bogus purchases, which the Tribunal reduced to 5%, citing potential savings from gray market purchases. The reopening of assessment under Sec. 147 was upheld, as new information justified it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>