https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36275 The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue and against the assessee in a case concerning property ownership post-separation and the validity of a partial partition. The court held that the properties continued to belong to the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) despite changes in family composition. It was determined that no valid partial partition occurred between the husband and wife, and the wife could not claim a partition of the HUF property as a matter of her own right. The Tribunal's decision to reject the claim of partial partition was upheld by the High Court. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:37:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36275 The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue and against the assessee in a case concerning property ownership post-separation and the validity of a partial partition. The court held that the properties continued to belong to the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) despite changes in family composition. It was determined that no valid partial partition occurred between the husband and wife, and the wife could not claim a partition of the HUF property as a matter of her own right. The Tribunal's decision to reject the claim of partial partition was upheld by the High Court. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Tue, 17 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36275