https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750644 The NCLAT dismissed the appellant's delay condonation application. The appellant claimed unawareness of the impugned order until it was uploaded on NCLT's website on 12.12.2023. However, the tribunal found that the order was pronounced on 10.11.2023 in the presence of appellant's counsel, making the limitation period commence from 11.11.2023. The appeal filed on 29.12.2023 was delayed by 18 days, exceeding the tribunal's 15-day condonable limit. The appellant failed to apply for a certified copy and could not claim ignorance of the order when their counsel was present during pronouncement. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750644 The NCLAT dismissed the appellant's delay condonation application. The appellant claimed unawareness of the impugned order until it was uploaded on NCLT's website on 12.12.2023. However, the tribunal found that the order was pronounced on 10.11.2023 in the presence of appellant's counsel, making the limitation period commence from 11.11.2023. The appeal filed on 29.12.2023 was delayed by 18 days, exceeding the tribunal's 15-day condonable limit. The appellant failed to apply for a certified copy and could not claim ignorance of the order when their counsel was present during pronouncement. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750644