https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750636 HC quashed the decision of Technical Evaluation Committee that accepted a bid despite non-compliance with mandatory requirements. The bidder failed to submit annual turnover certificates with UDIN for five financial years as required by ITB clauses, yet the committee selectively relied on parts of an inadmissible certificate. The court found this decision illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14. The impugned decision was set aside, and authorities were directed to issue fresh e-NIT inviting new bids with strict adherence to contract terms and conditions. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:28:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750636 HC quashed the decision of Technical Evaluation Committee that accepted a bid despite non-compliance with mandatory requirements. The bidder failed to submit annual turnover certificates with UDIN for five financial years as required by ITB clauses, yet the committee selectively relied on parts of an inadmissible certificate. The court found this decision illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14. The impugned decision was set aside, and authorities were directed to issue fresh e-NIT inviting new bids with strict adherence to contract terms and conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750636