<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1037 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313105</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the Gauhati HC&#039;s order, directing the completion of departmental enquiry within four months, starting from the show cause notice stage. The respondent was reinstated solely for completing proceedings, without back wages or service benefits. The appeal was allowed concerning disciplinary proceedings and reinstatement directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1037 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313105</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the Gauhati HC&#039;s order, directing the completion of departmental enquiry within four months, starting from the show cause notice stage. The respondent was reinstated solely for completing proceedings, without back wages or service benefits. The appeal was allowed concerning disciplinary proceedings and reinstatement directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>