<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 617 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313104</link>
    <description>Exemption from personal appearance under the Code is an exceptional, discretionary relief and must be granted only on a judicious assessment of the totality of circumstances; personal attendance remains the normal rule. On the facts discussed, factors such as age, ailment, distance and inconvenience were weighed against the allegations and the petitioners&#039; movements to official offices, and the refusal of exemption was treated as a reasonable view. Inherent jurisdiction was not invoked to disturb that refusal, and the earlier reliance on the provision for adjournment was considered irrelevant because the applications had been rejected as premature. A short stay of the warrant was noted to enable surrender and bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:11:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 617 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313104</link>
      <description>Exemption from personal appearance under the Code is an exceptional, discretionary relief and must be granted only on a judicious assessment of the totality of circumstances; personal attendance remains the normal rule. On the facts discussed, factors such as age, ailment, distance and inconvenience were weighed against the allegations and the petitioners&#039; movements to official offices, and the refusal of exemption was treated as a reasonable view. Inherent jurisdiction was not invoked to disturb that refusal, and the earlier reliance on the provision for adjournment was considered irrelevant because the applications had been rejected as premature. A short stay of the warrant was noted to enable surrender and bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>