https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313100 A select panel prepared beyond the three advertised vacancies could not be operated for future vacancies in the absence of statutory authority or an advertisement permitting such use. Recruitment had to conform to the governing rules and the terms of the notification, and a larger panel did not itself create any enforceable right to appointment. Review jurisdiction could not be used to reappraise the matter or confer a legal right where none existed. The Supreme Court upheld cancellation of the panel, set aside the High Court's review judgment, and rejected the directions founded on the future panel. en-us Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:43:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313100 A select panel prepared beyond the three advertised vacancies could not be operated for future vacancies in the absence of statutory authority or an advertisement permitting such use. Recruitment had to conform to the governing rules and the terms of the notification, and a larger panel did not itself create any enforceable right to appointment. Review jurisdiction could not be used to reappraise the matter or confer a legal right where none existed. The Supreme Court upheld cancellation of the panel, set aside the High Court's review judgment, and rejected the directions founded on the future panel. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313100