<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1127 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750630</link>
    <description>Police custody in revision will not be disturbed unless the Magistrate&#039;s refusal is shown to be illegal or improper on the record. A revisional court does not reappraise the matter as on appeal, and custodial interrogation must be specifically justified by demonstrated investigative necessity. Here, the investigation had already covered substantial transactions, the disputed invoices and transfers were linked to periods when the accused was not shown to be in office, and the available report did not substantiate diversion of government funds. The refusal to grant police custody was therefore lawful, and the revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1127 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750630</link>
      <description>Police custody in revision will not be disturbed unless the Magistrate&#039;s refusal is shown to be illegal or improper on the record. A revisional court does not reappraise the matter as on appeal, and custodial interrogation must be specifically justified by demonstrated investigative necessity. Here, the investigation had already covered substantial transactions, the disputed invoices and transfers were linked to periods when the accused was not shown to be in office, and the available report did not substantiate diversion of government funds. The refusal to grant police custody was therefore lawful, and the revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>