<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1124 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750627</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee&#039;s omission to add back the loss on the sale of machinery was an inadvertent and bona fide error, not an attempt to conceal income. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and overturning the decisions of the AO and the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 07:52:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1124 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750627</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee&#039;s omission to add back the loss on the sale of machinery was an inadvertent and bona fide error, not an attempt to conceal income. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and overturning the decisions of the AO and the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>