<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1111 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750614</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the imported goods, declared as &#039;Polyester Bed sheet,&#039; were correctly classified under CTH 6304 as Bed spreads/Bed sheets, contrary to the Revenue&#039;s claim of classification under CTH 5407. Consequently, the goods were not subject to confiscation, and duty was payable under CTH 6304. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s classification. Regarding the alleged willful mis-declaration and the imposition of a penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, the Tribunal found no basis for such a penalty, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on this issue as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2024 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1111 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750614</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the imported goods, declared as &#039;Polyester Bed sheet,&#039; were correctly classified under CTH 6304 as Bed spreads/Bed sheets, contrary to the Revenue&#039;s claim of classification under CTH 5407. Consequently, the goods were not subject to confiscation, and duty was payable under CTH 6304. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s classification. Regarding the alleged willful mis-declaration and the imposition of a penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, the Tribunal found no basis for such a penalty, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on this issue as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>